Cactus to Clouds is certainly increasing in popularity. Some of that is undoubtedly due to the Internet, but some of it is due to publicity in national magazines and descriptions in several guidebooks. I have been doing C2C only since 2002, so I am a relative newcomer. Nevertheless, I have certainly observed the trends that people are talking about.
Most of the trail is not on State Park land, so it does not matter what the State Park wants. Whether or not any agency recognizes or maintains the trail, people are using it regularly. The guy who hiked it for the first time yesterday has the same right to it as the one who has done it hundreds of times.
C2C is a use trail. It is easy to navigate, with or without ducks, dots, or GPS. It gets easier to navigate all the time because it is a popular use trail. You can't wish it back into its pristine state. It is not a question of good or bad, it is just reality.
It is possible that some control could be put on the trial. Permits could be required in order to regulate/limit use. Meanwhile, people like Perry and those who use his message board (i.e., you and I) can try to make the hike a positive experience for people or we can lament the good old days. What we can't do is stop people from atempting the hike. This message boarc could go away, of course, but its passing would not make much of a dent in the traffic, which was growing long before this board appeared.
I don't like all of the new shortcuts, markings, etc. But don't pretend that the old timers kept it pristine. I have encountered several people who have hiked the trail over 100 times who were taking all sorts of shortcuts. While the orange dots are new, there have been spray-painted signs of dubious value for years, including the huge (and beloved by many) sign on the large boulder near the start.
Having said all ofthat, I do applaud the metal sign that "guest" helped create and install.
